Loading market analysis
Not financial advice. Historical similarity does not guarantee future outcomes.
| Market | 1h | 4h | 24h | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | +0.08% | -0.56% | +0.13% | 10 |
| Timestamp | Echo Score | Similarity | Why This Matched | 1h | 4h | 24h | Max Up / Down |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.0 | +91% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 98On-chain 55Temporal 96Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | +0.05% | -1.18% | +0.30% | +2.87% / -2.06% | |
| HYPE |
| -0.00% |
| -0.55% |
| +0.74% |
| 10 |
| MON | +0.40% | +1.00% | +8.25% | 10 |
| ZEC | -0.13% | -0.23% | -0.23% | 10 |
| 87.9 |
| +86% |
Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 97On-chain 55Temporal 96Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability |
| -0.53% |
| -0.08% |
| -0.00% |
| +2.61% / -2.30% |
| 87.9 | +89% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 97On-chain 55Temporal 96Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | -0.55% | -1.10% | +0.32% | +2.83% / -2.09% |
| 87.8 | +86% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 96On-chain 55Temporal 96Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | +0.08% | -1.22% | +0.24% | +2.77% / -2.15% |
| 87.7 | +80% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 96On-chain 55Temporal 96Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | -0.46% | -0.04% | -0.12% | +2.69% / -2.22% |
| 87.7 | +96% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 97On-chain 55Temporal 93Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | +0.29% | +0.40% | +0.56% | +3.18% / +0.21% |
| 87.6 | +85% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 96On-chain 55Temporal 95Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | +0.55% | +0.80% | -0.50% | +1.96% / -1.77% |
| 87.6 | +95% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 95On-chain 55Temporal 96Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | -1.46% | -0.63% | +0.19% | +2.87% / -2.06% |
| 87.5 | +92% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 96On-chain 55Temporal 95Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | -0.17% | +0.08% | +0.51% | +1.82% / -0.91% |
| 87.5 | +83% | Score breakdownRegime 100Funding 74Structure 95On-chain 55Temporal 95Rarity 98- Same regime: SIDEWAYS- Funding percentile difference: 26.3%- Volatility regime matched- On-chain comparison unavailable, neutral score used- Candidate is recent enough to improve reliability | +0.41% | +0.66% | -0.99% | +1.85% / -1.87% |